On "Crack Farmers' Heads", Haryana Chief Minister's Censure, With Rider (FAKE BLOG)
DISCLAIMER: This blog is fully automated, unmonitored, and does not reflect the views of Garett MacGowan. The ML model may produce content that is offensive to some readers.
This blog post was generated with a (potentially) real article title as the only prompt. A link to the original article is below.
Photo by bady abbas on Unsplash
Generated: 9/6/2021
On "Crack Farmers' Heads", Haryana Chief Minister's Censure, With Rider-Waite Order, by Poonam Bagga | The News
The Haryana Chief Minister, Manohar Lal Katheria, was subjected to a searing public rebuke on Friday, September 28, 2017 from Punjab Assembly Speaker, Capt Amarinder Singh, who found Mr Katheria's comments about the Haryana government's efforts to crack down on the farmer suicides in Punjab "disgusting".
Mr Katheria was then asked to apologise by the Speaker, Capt Amarinder Singh, who told Mr Katheria that in "an attempt to defend the government's image and the state, and to salvage the face of the Punjab Government in Punjab and also in a sense to put out of sight the issues in Punjab, you went out and made inflammatory comments."
In the wake of Mr Katheria's public attack on the Haryana government, the Punjab Chief Minister, Captain Amarinder Singh asked the Haryana CM to tender an unconditional apology to the Assembly.
The Speaker's order came in response to another fiery public attack on Mr Katheria, by the Panchkula-based newspaper, The Tribune, where the Chief Minister was accused of acting in his personal interest and in violation of rules and regulations through his 'excessive, unnecessary and ill-will' action against the Haryana government after Mr Katheria made inflammatory remarks about government actions in Punjab.
The Chief Minister was also accused of acting in his personal interest by the newspaper in its editorial, with a 'scathing' review of Haryana's performance in the last three years, which was based on the results of the Haryana State Assembly elections and Lok Sabha elections.
The editorial of the newspaper said that after the "bitter defeat" in the last year's Haryana Assembly polls, and since the announcement of the Haryana government in October, the government's first reaction was to take control of the government. It was also alleged that it was to ensure that the Haryana government not be "tainted by the blood of the farmers of Haryana", which was "the chief cause" of the farmers' suicides in Punjab.
The newspaper wrote:
"In Punjab's case, government's efforts to crack farmers' heads by identifying and arresting those who were involved in the farmer suicide is the only reason it took over the government in Haryana. And now, the Chief Minister says he is also against the farmers' anger because it might hurt the farmers' sentiments. The Chief Minister should be ashamed of himself.
"This government is an extremely inefficient government, lacking in imagination. It is acting without any knowledge or understanding. So, when I hear this, I am not surprised. I am also not surprised. Why should I be?"
"This government is an extremely inefficient government, lacking in imagination. It is acting without any knowledge or understanding. So, when I hear this, I am not surprised. I am also not surprised. Why should I be?" - Panchkula's Tribune, September 24, 2017
The editorial of the newspaper also said that after the "bitter defeat" in the last year's Haryana Assembly polls and since the announcement of the Haryana government in October, the first reaction of the Haryana government was to take control of the government and ensure that it not be tainted by the blood of the farmers of Haryana who had committed suicide, which was the 'chief cause' of the farmer suicides in Punjab.
In the editorial, the newspaper said, "When was the Chief Minister's response appropriate, after an electoral defeat of 30pc in the state? Who is he representing? Does he represent the people of Punjab, or is he representing his own constituency? Does his political party represent Punjab?
"When was the Chief Minister's response appropriate, after an electoral defeat of 30pc in the state? Who is he representing? Does he represent the people of Punjab, or is he representing his own constituency? Does his political party represent Punjab? No government is going to solve this, that and the other problem.
"So, when I hear this, I am not surprised. I am also not surprised," the newspaper wrote.
The News today had quoted The Tribune's editorial on the attacks on Mr Katheria, which said that Mr Katheria was being "accused that he was 'acting in his personal interest and in violation of rules and regulations through his excessive, unnecessary and ill-will' action against the Haryana government, after he made public statements in the Assembly after the announcement of Haryana government."
The Tribune had also written that Mr Katheria was "attacking the Haryana government and he was also acting in his personal interest by attacking Punjab's Chief Minister, Captain Amarinder Singh, who was very close to Mr Katheria. His comment 'I am really saddened by the Haryana State Government's decision. I wish they didn't do it. The decision was taken by the Chief Minister and if he or his party is unhappy, then let them go to Punjab for polls', is an attempt to salvage his own image in Punjab.
The editorial had added that the Chief Minister had an 'extremely unpleasant and disappointing' meeting with Mr Katheria on October 4, 2017, wherein the Haryana Chief Minister had said that Haryana's 'decision' to take over the state government was 'absolutely unacceptable'.
"The Chief Minister has said that he is unhappy and the decision was taken through the Chief Minister's intervention. But, what is the Chief Minister's 'intervention' on government's decisions? So, what is his 'intervention'?" Poonam Bagga, senior journalist at The News, wrote in the editorial.
Poonam Bagga also wrote, "While Haryana goes to polls on December 7, the State government is trying to put out a 'good image of itself' and 'bad image' of the Chief Minister. Haryana's Chief Minister has been under attack for his 'intervention' in Punjab, and yet he has taken the trouble himself to speak to his 'colleagues' in Haryana.
"I am really saddened by the Haryana State Government's decision. I wish they didn't do it. The decision was taken by the Chief Minister and if he or his party is unhappy, then let them go to Punjab for polls," the editorial of Haryana news website, The Tribune, said.
The Tribune had also said that Mr Katheria was "attacking the Haryana government and he was also acting in his personal interest by attacking Punjab's Chief Minister, Captain Amarinder Singh, who was very close to Mr Katheria. His comment 'I am really saddened by the Haryana State Government's decision. I wish they didn't do it. The decision was taken by the Chief Minister and if he or his party is unhappy, then let them go to Punjab for polls'.
The Tribune had also added that Mr Katheria had said that the decision was taken by the Chief Minister, with Captain Amarinder Singh's support. "His claim is that the Chief Minister, after deciding to take over the government, went to the Chief Minister for permission to take over, but the Chief Minister was not at home. So, he had to call Captain Amarinder Singh."
"If Haryana chief minister attacks the Punjab CM, and then after a few minutes he is telling that he is 'really saddened', then the Punjab chief minister would be justified to write a strong letter to Haryana chief minister and to go to the Governor for a strong action," the editorial said.
The editorial also said, "Why is it that when the Haryana government takes over the government in Punjab, then the entire Punjab government is attacked to get Haryana out of the way, while Haryana's own government is attacked?
"After the Punjab election, the entire state machinery - police, Army, teachers, civil defence personnel, journalists, lawyers, NGOs, people who were there in the battle with the terrorists - was attacked. The Election Commission was attacked, the Election Commission officials were attacked, the EPCOI was attacked. The entire state machinery was attacked.
"So, when I hear this, I am not surprised. I am also not surprised. Why should I be?" - Poonam Bagga of The Tribune, September 24, 2017
The editorial of The Tribune had also added, "Punjab's Chief Minister was also attacked, so the entire Punjab government was attacked. This is to get Haryana out of the way.
"Punjab's Chief Minister was also attacked, so the entire Punjab government was attacked. This is to get Haryana out of the way. Punjab's Chief Minister was also attacked, so the entire Punjab government was attacked. This is to get Haryana out of the way. Punjab's Chief Minister was also attacked, so the entire Punjab government was attacked. This is to get Haryana out of the way. Punjab's Chief Minister was also attacked, so the entire Punjab government was attacked. This is to get Haryana out of the way. Punjab's Chief Minister was also attacked, so the entire Punjab government was attacked. This is to get Haryana out of the way. Punjab's Chief Minister was also attacked, so the entire Punjab government was attacked. This is to get Haryana out of the way. Punjab's Chief Minister was also attacked, so the entire Punjab government was attacked. This is to get Haryana out of the way. Punjab's Chief Minister was also attacked, so the entire Punjab government was attacked. This is to get Hary
The Haryana Chief Minister, Manohar Lal Katheria, was subjected to a searing public rebuke on Friday, September 28, 2017 from Punjab Assembly Speaker, Capt Amarinder Singh, who found Mr Katheria's comments about the Haryana government's efforts to crack down on the farmer suicides in Punjab "disgusting".
Mr Katheria was then asked to apologise by the Speaker, Capt Amarinder Singh, who told Mr Katheria that in "an attempt to defend the government's image and the state, and to salvage the face of the Punjab Government in Punjab and also in a sense to put out of sight the issues in Punjab, you went out and made inflammatory comments."
In the wake of Mr Katheria's public attack on the Haryana government, the Punjab Chief Minister, Captain Amarinder Singh asked the Haryana CM to tender an unconditional apology to the Assembly.
The Speaker's order came in response to another fiery public attack on Mr Katheria, by the Panchkula-based newspaper, The Tribune, where the Chief Minister was accused of acting in his personal interest and in violation of rules and regulations through his 'excessive, unnecessary and ill-will' action against the Haryana government after Mr Katheria made inflammatory remarks about government actions in Punjab.
The Chief Minister was also accused of acting in his personal interest by the newspaper in its editorial, with a 'scathing' review of Haryana's performance in the last three years, which was based on the results of the Haryana State Assembly elections and Lok Sabha elections.
The editorial of the newspaper said that after the "bitter defeat" in the last year's Haryana Assembly polls, and since the announcement of the Haryana government in October, the government's first reaction was to take control of the government. It was also alleged that it was to ensure that the Haryana government not be "tainted by the blood of the farmers of Haryana", which was "the chief cause" of the farmers' suicides in Punjab.
The newspaper wrote:
"In Punjab's case, government's efforts to crack farmers' heads by identifying and arresting those who were involved in the farmer suicide is the only reason it took over the government in Haryana. And now, the Chief Minister says he is also against the farmers' anger because it might hurt the farmers' sentiments. The Chief Minister should be ashamed of himself.
"This government is an extremely inefficient government, lacking in imagination. It is acting without any knowledge or understanding. So, when I hear this, I am not surprised. I am also not surprised. Why should I be?"
"This government is an extremely inefficient government, lacking in imagination. It is acting without any knowledge or understanding. So, when I hear this, I am not surprised. I am also not surprised. Why should I be?" - Panchkula's Tribune, September 24, 2017
The editorial of the newspaper also said that after the "bitter defeat" in the last year's Haryana Assembly polls and since the announcement of the Haryana government in October, the first reaction of the Haryana government was to take control of the government and ensure that it not be tainted by the blood of the farmers of Haryana who had committed suicide, which was the 'chief cause' of the farmer suicides in Punjab.
In the editorial, the newspaper said, "When was the Chief Minister's response appropriate, after an electoral defeat of 30pc in the state? Who is he representing? Does he represent the people of Punjab, or is he representing his own constituency? Does his political party represent Punjab?
"When was the Chief Minister's response appropriate, after an electoral defeat of 30pc in the state? Who is he representing? Does he represent the people of Punjab, or is he representing his own constituency? Does his political party represent Punjab? No government is going to solve this, that and the other problem.
"So, when I hear this, I am not surprised. I am also not surprised," the newspaper wrote.
The News today had quoted The Tribune's editorial on the attacks on Mr Katheria, which said that Mr Katheria was being "accused that he was 'acting in his personal interest and in violation of rules and regulations through his excessive, unnecessary and ill-will' action against the Haryana government, after he made public statements in the Assembly after the announcement of Haryana government."
The Tribune had also written that Mr Katheria was "attacking the Haryana government and he was also acting in his personal interest by attacking Punjab's Chief Minister, Captain Amarinder Singh, who was very close to Mr Katheria. His comment 'I am really saddened by the Haryana State Government's decision. I wish they didn't do it. The decision was taken by the Chief Minister and if he or his party is unhappy, then let them go to Punjab for polls', is an attempt to salvage his own image in Punjab.
The editorial had added that the Chief Minister had an 'extremely unpleasant and disappointing' meeting with Mr Katheria on October 4, 2017, wherein the Haryana Chief Minister had said that Haryana's 'decision' to take over the state government was 'absolutely unacceptable'.
"The Chief Minister has said that he is unhappy and the decision was taken through the Chief Minister's intervention. But, what is the Chief Minister's 'intervention' on government's decisions? So, what is his 'intervention'?" Poonam Bagga, senior journalist at The News, wrote in the editorial.
Poonam Bagga also wrote, "While Haryana goes to polls on December 7, the State government is trying to put out a 'good image of itself' and 'bad image' of the Chief Minister. Haryana's Chief Minister has been under attack for his 'intervention' in Punjab, and yet he has taken the trouble himself to speak to his 'colleagues' in Haryana.
"I am really saddened by the Haryana State Government's decision. I wish they didn't do it. The decision was taken by the Chief Minister and if he or his party is unhappy, then let them go to Punjab for polls," the editorial of Haryana news website, The Tribune, said.
The Tribune had also said that Mr Katheria was "attacking the Haryana government and he was also acting in his personal interest by attacking Punjab's Chief Minister, Captain Amarinder Singh, who was very close to Mr Katheria. His comment 'I am really saddened by the Haryana State Government's decision. I wish they didn't do it. The decision was taken by the Chief Minister and if he or his party is unhappy, then let them go to Punjab for polls'.
The Tribune had also added that Mr Katheria had said that the decision was taken by the Chief Minister, with Captain Amarinder Singh's support. "His claim is that the Chief Minister, after deciding to take over the government, went to the Chief Minister for permission to take over, but the Chief Minister was not at home. So, he had to call Captain Amarinder Singh."
"If Haryana chief minister attacks the Punjab CM, and then after a few minutes he is telling that he is 'really saddened', then the Punjab chief minister would be justified to write a strong letter to Haryana chief minister and to go to the Governor for a strong action," the editorial said.
The editorial also said, "Why is it that when the Haryana government takes over the government in Punjab, then the entire Punjab government is attacked to get Haryana out of the way, while Haryana's own government is attacked?
"After the Punjab election, the entire state machinery - police, Army, teachers, civil defence personnel, journalists, lawyers, NGOs, people who were there in the battle with the terrorists - was attacked. The Election Commission was attacked, the Election Commission officials were attacked, the EPCOI was attacked. The entire state machinery was attacked.
"So, when I hear this, I am not surprised. I am also not surprised. Why should I be?" - Poonam Bagga of The Tribune, September 24, 2017
The editorial of The Tribune had also added, "Punjab's Chief Minister was also attacked, so the entire Punjab government was attacked. This is to get Haryana out of the way.
"Punjab's Chief Minister was also attacked, so the entire Punjab government was attacked. This is to get Haryana out of the way. Punjab's Chief Minister was also attacked, so the entire Punjab government was attacked. This is to get Haryana out of the way. Punjab's Chief Minister was also attacked, so the entire Punjab government was attacked. This is to get Haryana out of the way. Punjab's Chief Minister was also attacked, so the entire Punjab government was attacked. This is to get Haryana out of the way. Punjab's Chief Minister was also attacked, so the entire Punjab government was attacked. This is to get Haryana out of the way. Punjab's Chief Minister was also attacked, so the entire Punjab government was attacked. This is to get Haryana out of the way. Punjab's Chief Minister was also attacked, so the entire Punjab government was attacked. This is to get Haryana out of the way. Punjab's Chief Minister was also attacked, so the entire Punjab government was attacked. This is to get Hary